To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
IMO, it's naive to think that you can set up a system as simple as dylansmrjones suggests, without a referee, and have it work.
There are simply too many pathological conditions that the system can get into that require intervention to resolve in a reasonable amount of time. The simplest case being that of a monopoly. Completely free markets encourage that particular pathological condition. The motivations, and actions, of the monopolists *eventually* do bring them down. But do we really want the system to be in failure mode for the majority of the time?
We tried Laissez-faire here in the US. "We, the People" were rewarded with sweatshops, cheap child labor, and an ultra-rich super-class to read about in the newspapers.
Edited 2007-08-31 16:40




Member since:
2006-02-28
Well, to me you are as wrong and insane as communists.
And to me, driving people by pure ideas is not realistic. Ideas are necessary, but just to give small orientation to politics.
The more you make a government being strongly lead by an ideal, the more insane society you get.