OSNews

What does "VR" stand for?
I am curious because you seem to compare some of us to prisoners, in the context of freedom, the lack of.

>BSD is the freedom to enslave other people.

How so? How does BSD enslave anyone? If anything it gives me code to learn from and use in ,almost, every way I see fit. How does that equate slavery?

I really, truly wish there were a enforceable moratorium on the use of the word "Freedom" when discussing software licensing. If nothing else, it's a misuse of the word - the definition that's relevant is "power to determine action without restraint." In literal terms, that doesn't apply to any license I can think of - commercial, GPL, BSD, MIT, etc (with the exception of public domain, which isn't really a license per se). Really, what is a software license if not a list/set of restrictions on use & distribution? Once something is restricted in any way, then it is - by definition - not free.

Certainly the relative degree to which different licenses are restricted is a valid topic - and as with anyone else who finds the subject interesting, I find specific sets of restrictions (licenses) more palatable than others. But that doesn't mean that it's valid for me try to equate my preferred set of restrictions with "freedom" - and equate all other sets of restrictions with "enslavement."

"Between the weak and the strong, it is freedom that oppresses and the law that liberates." J.J.R.

Edited 2007-09-01 09:07