Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 31st Aug 2007 22:01 UTC
Apple "With the latest release of Apple's office productivity suite, iWork '08, the Pages application moves into the ranks of full-fledged word processing applications. Previously known more for its page layout capabilities than for its word processing capabilities, Pages now enables users to switch seamlessly between writing and designing documents. In addition, the application offers 140 document templates and a snazzy track-changes feature, both of which work to position iWork '08 as an apt rival to Microsoft's Office 2004 for Mac in the OS X-compatible office productivity arena."
Thread beginning with comment 267551
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Good.
by KugelKurt on Sat 1st Sep 2007 00:36 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: Good."
KugelKurt
Member since:
2005-07-06

Even ODF needs updates. As long as updates don't break backward compatibility just because they can and as long as the changes are documented there's no problems with updates.

ODF 1.1 (the current version) should support everything used by iWork 08. KWord is frame-based just like Pages and Numbers' concept with several sheets on one page is basically the same as KOffice 2's Flake Shape concept.
If the KOffice developers can implant all that with ODF, Apple could have done the same.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 8

RE[6]: Good.
by aliquis on Sat 1st Sep 2007 13:00 in reply to "RE[5]: Good."
aliquis Member since:
2005-07-23

But then if someone writes a document in staroffice 12 which uses odf 2.2 and I want to open that in ilife '11 which uses 1.7 and it don't know about all the new stuff in 2.2 won't I have the same problem and can't open it completely?

But sure, the actuall data within the file is readable.

Can anyone add to ODF? Could Apple say "hey we need this functionallity added, add that so we can use it" and it would get added even if openoffice didn't understood it, got a use for it and couldn't show it?

If not it's rather useless and Apples decision is understandable. I doubt they do it as much for vendor lockin as they do it because it's more convenient for them. Also Pages have existed longer than ODF have been a standard haven't it? And only open-/staroffice used it back then.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[7]: Good.
by KugelKurt on Sat 1st Sep 2007 14:37 in reply to "RE[6]: Good."
KugelKurt Member since:
2005-07-06

But then if someone writes a document in staroffice 12 which uses odf 2.2 and I want to open that in ilife '11 which uses 1.7 and it don't know about all the new stuff in 2.2 won't I have the same problem and can't open it completely?

It's the developer's responsibility to keep his application updated to follow subsequent ODF specifications.

Can anyone add to ODF?

Seems like it:
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/membership.php?wg_abbrev=offic...

Could Apple say "hey we need this functionallity added, add that so we can use it" and it would get added even if openoffice didn't understood it, got a use for it and couldn't show it?

Yes.

Also Pages have existed longer than ODF have been a standard haven't it? And only open-/staroffice used it back then.

As I said: Pages changes its file format every release.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1