Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 2nd Sep 2007 18:40 UTC
GNU, GPL, Open Source Eric S. Raymond writes on his blog: "There's been a lot of debate in the community about how OSI should properly handle Microsoft's planned submission of some of its licenses for OSD certification. That debate has been been going on within OSI, too. OSI's official position, from the beginning, which I helped formulate and have expressed to any number of reporters and analysts, is that OSI will treat any licenses submitted to Microsoft strictly on their merits, without fear or favor. That remains OSI's position. But I find that my resolve is being sorely tested."
Thread beginning with comment 268024
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: The article in short
by archiesteel on Sun 2nd Sep 2007 22:37 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: The article in short"
archiesteel
Member since:
2005-07-02

So can you tell me who begat the "Molly Cieslinski" accusations? Was it he, or was it you, or someone else? (Please say it was archiesteel! ;) )


I made the allegation first, and I've been waiting for a denial ever since. Now that you've officially denied being *that* MollyC, I won't make it again (though in my mind you still act like a pro-MS PR hack).

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 5