Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 2nd Sep 2007 18:40 UTC
Eric S. Raymond writes on his blog: "There's been a lot of debate in the community about how OSI should properly handle Microsoft's planned submission of some of its licenses for OSD certification. That debate has been been going on within OSI, too. OSI's official position, from the beginning, which I helped formulate and have expressed to any number of reporters and analysts, is that OSI will treat any licenses submitted to Microsoft strictly on their merits, without fear or favor. That remains OSI's position. But I find that my resolve is being sorely tested."
Thread beginning with comment 268185
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: The article in short
by sappyvcv on Mon 3rd Sep 2007 17:22
in reply to "RE[5]: The article in short"
Member since:2005-07-06
RE[7]: The article in short
by archiesteel on Mon 3rd Sep 2007 17:28
in reply to "RE[6]: The article in short"
Member since:2005-07-02
Member since:
2005-07-02
Actually, you misunderstood me: it should be up to Microsoft to compete *using* ODF.