To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"It doesn't say that OOXML cannot support Windows OLE. Dansk Standard says that OOXML should contain support other OLE-techniques, like KParts and Bonobo. It does not say that OOXML cannot or must not support Windows OLE."
Huh? Seems like weird reason to reject a format. Denmark had no problem with ODF lacking spreadsheet formulas, yet they do raise a fuss over OOXML lacking KParts and Bonobo? :p
Or how about, "We reject ANSI-standardization of C standardization because C lacks closures and continuations".
BTW, Mac Office supports OLE, so it's not like it's impossible to grock the OLE formats on non-Windows platforms. Meaning, the the OLE file format isn't "Windows OLE", just "OLE".
Well, considering your poor denial of who you are, I consider your actions more important.
You still work as a PR-consultant for Microsoft, right?
Your statements about ODF and spreadsheet formulas are pure FUD.
http://www.robweir.com/blog/2007/07/formula-for-failure.html
Besides that ODF does support spreadsheet formulas through OLE.
What Mac Office supports is irrelevant in this context.







Member since:
2005-10-02
It doesn't say that OOXML cannot support Windows OLE. Dansk Standard says that OOXML should contain support other OLE-techniques, like KParts and Bonobo. It does not say that OOXML cannot or must not support Windows OLE.