Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 2nd Sep 2007 18:40 UTC
GNU, GPL, Open Source Eric S. Raymond writes on his blog: "There's been a lot of debate in the community about how OSI should properly handle Microsoft's planned submission of some of its licenses for OSD certification. That debate has been been going on within OSI, too. OSI's official position, from the beginning, which I helped formulate and have expressed to any number of reporters and analysts, is that OSI will treat any licenses submitted to Microsoft strictly on their merits, without fear or favor. That remains OSI's position. But I find that my resolve is being sorely tested."
Thread beginning with comment 268330
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Isses wit OOXML
by sbergman27 on Tue 4th Sep 2007 04:12 UTC in reply to "Isses wit OOXML"
sbergman27
Member since:
2005-07-24

I agree. But I think that the guilty party was Sweden, not Switzerland. ;-)

Edited 2007-09-04 04:13

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[2]: Isses wit OOXML
by Kokopelli on Tue 4th Sep 2007 04:40 in reply to "RE: Isses wit OOXML"
Kokopelli Member since:
2005-07-06

Oops, well if that and spelling are the only two problems people point out I guess it could be worse. ;-)

Reply Parent Score: 1