Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 4th Sep 2007 21:40 UTC, submitted by archiesteel
Thread beginning with comment 268663
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2007-02-17
Agreed. OOXML is clearly the antithesis of "consensus".
It occurs to me that I was not clear in why I mentioned "consensus". Consensus is actually required for OOXML to get past the next stage:
http://www.iso.org/iso/pressrelease.htm?refid=Ref1070
The objective of the meeting will be to review and seek consensus on possible modifications to the document in light of the comments received along with the votes. If the proposed modifications are such that national bodies then wish to withdraw their negative votes, and the above acceptance criteria are then met, the standard may proceed to publication.
ISO's own words, my bold.