Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 4th Sep 2007 21:40 UTC, submitted by archiesteel
Thread beginning with comment 268747
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Countries that voted yes should be influenced to vote no. Especially the countries that have done this in a suspicious way.
It's very hard to do so. The countries that voted yes are mostly poor, corrupt countries where money will get you anything you want. Money talks there, not reason. Unless FFII is prepared to offer conter-bribes, fat chance of swaying the vote.
As it is, on the current vote OOXML was barred within very thin limits (a few percentage points on the no-vote for instance, it was 26% when 24% would have meant pass). Microsoft is right to expect the situation to hold in their favor in february. They will have a lot of time to consolidate their cronies and undermine ODF.
Of course, in the long term all those countries lose. They lock themselves in Microsoft's proprietary formats, lose any credibility with ISO, don't have a real open format to use. But as I said, it's not about being reasonable.






Member since:
2006-03-10
QUOTE
What an open standard cannot have is dependencies on proprietary technologies. Especially unspecified proprietary technologies.
UNQUOTE
Well said..........
I totally agree with you here....
So I hope that the standards body will keep this in mind.
I think the FSF must start a campaign as well because you can expect MS to do the same. Countries that voted yes should be influenced to vote no. Especially the countries that have done this in a suspicious way.