Linked by Eugenia Loli on Tue 4th Sep 2007 22:00 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 268759
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I guess I didn't write that right, I guess what I was saying, the foleo was unique in that it's "standby" didn't drain battery(well, as much as a lith-ion on the shelf would), unlike that of a true laptop, which has to keep the memory powered to have standby functionality - a feature that I sorely wanted in a device. I'd like to take a device a week or two from its last charge and turn it on in a split second fire off an email and back off again.




Member since:
2006-01-08
> the foleo relied on using flash ram, which didn't require power to keep memory ...
The Foleo uses flash ram for non-volatile storage and DRAM for program execution and volatile data, unlike older PDAs which used (battery-backed) DRAM for both. But they still rely on standby for instant-on, because rebooting WinCE/PalmOS/Linux every time is far too slow. And I believe so does the Foleo, unless they've done some very major work on Linux.
> It could be very useful to most people.
What I meant wasn't that an instant-on computer isn't useful, but that one that instants on to pure DOS (which can boot in about 1s on modern hardware) or to a very stripped down Linux console (you can probably get this under 3s if you compile everything as modules and use the most minimal init script) is not useful to most people.