Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 5th Sep 2007 17:22 UTC, submitted by gonzo
Thread beginning with comment 269203
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I'm not at all happy with the Mono crowd. The deeper they get sucked into Mono, the more like MS apologists they seem. It's very unfortunate that Gnome has got mixed up in all this, though I don't use Gnome anyway. Sooner rather than later, I suspect the Gnome crowd is going to have to make some tough choices about whether it's really healthy to have the Mono boys and Miguel involved with them to the extent they present are.
It has already been decided that Mono cannot be a dependency for the Gnome platform. Bindings are ok.





Member since:
2005-11-05
The problem with Silverlight doesn't lie in whether it's cross-platform or free as in beer. The problem lies in the binary blob, an excellent way for Microsoft to hedge around what can be done with it, enforce control, require MS Silverlight servers, and even eventually charge for the more esoteric blobs. It's all a way of roping people in just as surely as an other proprietary set-up.
I'm not at all happy with the Mono crowd. The deeper they get sucked into Mono, the more like MS apologists they seem. It's very unfortunate that Gnome has got mixed up in all this, though I don't use Gnome anyway. Sooner rather than later, I suspect the Gnome crowd is going to have to make some tough choices about whether it's really healthy to have the Mono boys and Miguel involved with them to the extent they present are. Read the wrong blog, and you'll almost get the impression in some quarters that Gnome is Mono.