Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 6th Sep 2007 23:11 UTC, submitted by Forsberg
Thread beginning with comment 269508
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: When did OSNEWS stoop so low?
by Isolationist on Fri 7th Sep 2007 15:44
in reply to "RE[3]: When did OSNEWS stoop so low?"
RE[5]: When did OSNEWS stoop so low?
by kcy29581 on Sat 8th Sep 2007 12:17
in reply to "RE[4]: When did OSNEWS stoop so low?"
RE[4]: When did OSNEWS stoop so low?
by kcy29581 on Sat 8th Sep 2007 12:18
in reply to "RE[3]: When did OSNEWS stoop so low?"
RE[5]: When did OSNEWS stoop so low?
by kaiwai on Sun 9th Sep 2007 03:29
in reply to "RE[4]: When did OSNEWS stoop so low?"
Can someone please show me the trolling remark? Cause it seems to me you don't get humour...
Lower the viewing threshold and you'll see it (probably sitting at -5) - its not funny, its pathetic. I love a bit of humour that tickles my funny bone and takes the piss, but it wasn't even funny in the romotest sense.
Heck, I love weird and worderful things like "Trigger Happy TV" and the likes, and it doesn't even sit in that realm of weirdness. It was a pathetic troll, plain and simple. Accusing contributors of being anti-linux and dishonest, its pathetic.
Maybe he would be good for a guest on David Letterman to suit his line up of non-humourous antics which are so painful to watch they would make you eyes and ears bleed.



" 
Member since:
2005-07-06
Mate, you came onto this board trolling; you weren't marked down because of 'crushed ego' but because of a stupid demark that was so offtopic it was in a league of its own. Nothing to do with being precious.