Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 10th Sep 2007 20:04 UTC, submitted by dylansmrjones
Thread beginning with comment 270281
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2005-08-26
Say you agree to rent someone a house that you out-right own (no mortgage) and built yourself.
The renter pays the security deposit, then claims to own the house. This house that you put together with your own tools, hands, friends, etc is the subject of a court case. The renter keeps loudly proclaiming to be the rightful owner, even though everyone in town knows you built the house years ago, and had only agreed to rent it to the man.
It takes years before the judge in the case finally sees through the renters lies, and does the only right thing to do in such a case.
Evicts the renter, and tells them to sod off.
Sorry, but SCO never had what they claim, they -knew- there were extra conditions on the broad terms of the contract (these terms are not contradictory, they are merely finer detail of the terms of agreement), and they still tried to claim they owned something of which they merely purchased a right to use.
Novell and IBM are totally justified in making this personal, and I sincerely hope they crush, rather than acquire SCO. Send a message. Don't *uck with us.