To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Compiz has this smoothness to it that apples stuff lacks. The windows seem to uses acceleration so they alway bounce a little before settling into their positions. The same for the cube. This is all configurable but the default is great. Compiz has a more pleasing feel to it when it comes to the animations. The scale plugin (expose) has now surpassed Apple's offering, imo. Being able to type the name of the window to select it, bringing windows forward, closing windows while in scale is really intuitive and I wish that apple would consider implementing some of these features. The linux community has always been good embracing and extending. They love to extend the hell out of stuff. The smartest thing that Dave did when he created compiz is to make it pluggable, if there is one thing the OSS community is good at is making plugins.




Member since:
2007-08-11
fast user switching was in linux well before it was in windows XP. It just wasn't streamlined or highlighted as well. You could run 2 or more X sessions and login to either as a different (or the same) user and switch between them easily. Its not as elegant a solution as in XP, but essentially the idea originated with X.

Not that I care. I think we cant win either way.
If compiz didn't copy OSX at all the OSX people would say, but it cant do THIS therefore OSX is better...and if they did copy OSX they'll say "but you copied it all from OSX"...
There are unique features in compiz if you look closely.
And I've had a couple OSX users ask if compiz is available for OSX because they think it looks BETTER than what apple has.