Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 12th Sep 2007 11:51 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 270612
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Fine - but this isn't even under an OSI approved license, is it? So I wouldn't call it "Open Source". Open Source implies more than just "I can view the code".
No, it's not and probably couldn't be approved by OSI, because you cannot freely redistribute the product (you need to buy a license.)
I guess it depends on what your definition of "open" is. ([CLINTON MODE OFF])




Member since:
2006-02-15
Fine - but this isn't even under an OSI approved license, is it?
So I wouldn't call it "Open Source". Open Source implies more than just "I can view the code".