Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 12th Sep 2007 11:51 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 270679
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: This is free software. GPL not required
by wannabe geek on Wed 12th Sep 2007 21:10
in reply to "This is free software. GPL not required"
Umm... it's NOT free sofware. It's NOT open source.
If anything, it's a kind of "shared source".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_source
RE[2]: This is free software. GPL not required
by Thom_Holwerda on Wed 12th Sep 2007 21:12
in reply to "RE: This is free software. GPL not required"
Umm... it's NOT free sofware. It's NOT open source.
If anything, it's a kind of "shared source".
Nonsense.
They allow everyone to look at the code, download it, compile it, change it, share it with their peers or keep it to themselves, heck, they can even make a distribution and put that online - they are just not allowed to sell it.
RE[2]: This is free software. GPL not required
by npang on Wed 12th Sep 2007 22:07
in reply to "RE: This is free software. GPL not required"







Member since:
2006-11-26
It doesn't matter if this is licensed under the GPL. The fact that this is now free software means that we have the liberty to study the logic of that code. This means that we can write our own code that implements the same logic and we can release our (hypothetical) software under any license that we have chosen.