Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 21st Sep 2007 22:13 UTC, submitted by Jonathan Roberts
Fedora Core "For a while now, Clearlooks has been the default theme in Fedora; in fact, for a long time, Clearlooks has been the default theme in a number of distros thanks to its place as Gnome's default. Aiming to give Fedora its own distinct and modern appearance is Nodoka: based on its own theme engine it's extremely fast, and when seen in combination with the rest of the artwork for Fedora 8 is beautiful. Read on for an interview with Martin Sourada and some screenshots of the theme."
Thread beginning with comment 273265
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Modern?
by jtfolden on Fri 21st Sep 2007 22:46 UTC
jtfolden
Member since:
2005-08-12

Modern appearance? ...only in a pre-2001/pre-OS X world.

RE: Modern?
by s_groening on Fri 21st Sep 2007 23:15 in reply to "Modern?"
s_groening Member since:
2005-12-13

Yes, exactly my thought.... Theres nothing especially 'modern' sbout this theme, and just like most of the GTK+ themes out there, it's flat and unattractive, compared to Mac OS X 10.4.x .... I really think it's a pity that so many GTK+ themes tend to nglect what's really important... Consistency and non intrusive behaviour on the desktop ... Apple has realized, among all of it's Mac OS X 10.4.x blunders, that the pin stripe Aqua theme didn't work at all as well as first thought out in 1999 ... They've worked on making it look much more 'quiet' ... But what the Gnome theme developers tend to do is to make 'almost copies' of what already exists with very few changes ... Nothing serious ...

I just thought it'd be better to give the platform at strong, unified look, integrating it with the tool set so that whenever you build applications your default look would be more 'Gnome 2.20' than 'Windows 95' to look at ... Why not revolutionize the way to look at skis and themes, by making them obsolete for the average user and from there on let everyone change it?

There's a good reason for the gui layouts of commercial OSs to be consistent ... Whether you like Mac OS X or not ...

Edited 2007-09-21 23:28

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 4

RE[2]: Modern?
by unoengborg on Sat 22nd Sep 2007 05:24 in reply to "RE: Modern?"
unoengborg Member since:
2005-07-06

There's a good reason for the gui layouts of commercial OSs to be consistent ... Whether you like Mac OS X or not ...

Today, both Gnome is a very consistent environment, and don't think MacOS-X have any advantages over Gnome in this respect. The reason you sometimes see inconsistencies on a Unix/Linux desktop is that there are so many toolkits to chose from, a KDE app will stick out like a sore thumb in Gnome and vice versa.

However, most people will avoid using non Gnome apps on Gnome desktops just like MacOS-X users avoid using X11 apps like OpenOffice on their desktops.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE: Modern?
by spikeb on Sat 22nd Sep 2007 01:24 in reply to "Modern?"
spikeb Member since:
2006-01-18

bah, it's perfectly modern. modern does not mean blinding.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 5

RE: Modern?
by Snifflez on Sat 22nd Sep 2007 02:45 in reply to "Modern?"
Snifflez Member since:
2005-11-15

Really? I think OSX theme sucks.

Please, stop trying to postulate your subjective opinions as indisputable facts.

/* edit: Boy, am I gonna get modded down for this! */

Edited 2007-09-22 02:51 UTC

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 8

RE[2]: Modern?
by s_groening on Sat 22nd Sep 2007 09:43 in reply to "RE: Modern?"
s_groening Member since:
2005-12-13

What makes YOU so damn wise in this department?

I bet you mostly hate OS X for not being Linux just as I bet you're sure that everyone liking OS X and Aqua MUST be Apple 'fanboys' or whatever people tend to call it out of a lack of anything more intelligent to say ...

Fine if you don't like it, but that's YOUR subjective opinion ...

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE: Modern?
by unoengborg on Sat 22nd Sep 2007 05:06 in reply to "Modern?"
unoengborg Member since:
2005-07-06

Modern or not is irrelevant. The important thing is wheter it is easy to read or use, and I think Nodoka is OK in that respect. On the other hand, so was/is Clearlooks. Only the developers can tell whether it was worth the trouble making these improvements.

Anyway, it looks good and thanks for all efforts and tim put into it.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2