Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 23rd Sep 2007 13:31 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 273587
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2007-02-17
There are several press articles online from a day or so ago which explain this much better:
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20070920153227686
http://linux-watch.com/news/NS3973290690.html
http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/news_press_release,182497.s...
http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2007/sep/20/busybox/complaint.p...
... and here is the forum discussion which provoked it all ...
http://www.myhava.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=499
There are a number of statements from Monsoon Multimedia to the effect that the source for BusyBox as it appears in the Hava device would be made available soon, but apparently it never was ...
As soon as Monsoon Multimedia make the source code for BusyBox (as it appears in the Hava) available, the whole thing will blow over.
I cannot for the life of me imagine any scenario where it makes sense for Monsoon Multimedia to fight this in court as opposed to the simple act of making available source code to BusyBox which is already open source anyway.
Edited 2007-09-23 14:13