Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 23rd Sep 2007 13:31 UTC
The Software Freedom Law Center has filed the first US infringement case to defend the General Public License version 2. The case has been brought against Monsoon Multimedia, a specialist in video viewing and capturing devices, which has offices in Silicon Valley and in New Delhi. SFLC legal director Dan Ravicher told The Register: "This case could have far-reaching implications because it's the first case in the US to enforce copyright in GPL."
Thread beginning with comment 273609
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2005-07-12
>> Looking passed your broken English deathshadow...
Conversational prose is not broken English; using the word passed instead of past is - as is your own use of unrelated sentence fragments. Helf hit it on the head - what a maroon, next we'll brake and axel, our troops will go rouge (better dead than red I always say), eco-nuts will try to stop the cutting down of timbre, there'll be ignorant ideas and points will be mute: Oh the humanity!
As to most everyone else who responded so far it looks like nobody got the joke. I KNOW what they mean and what this is about. Just to clarify, my point was this part of the article:
>> Monsoon lost its right to distribute BusyBox code
>> because it was, according to the SFLC, not adhering
>> to the terms of the GPL; it was not distributing
>> machine readable code that would allow end-users of
>> the product to modify the software.
Again I ask: Machine readable code? (and yes, that too is proper English.) Last time I checked the only code that was 'machine readable' was native bytecode, often called an executable or binary. If they didn't include that then they had no product.
Last time I checked the GPL was about source code, not binaries...
Oh, and remind me not to try and use intellectual humor in here - it's apparantly wasted.
Edited 2007-09-23 15:27