To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
You misunderstood me. I am not saying the messed up upgrade is good - I'm saying that the fact that I can now do a fresh install is good. That is something completely different. A fresh install is much better from a reviewer's perspective, as it creates a much more objective environment.
Edited 2007-09-23 16:53 UTC
The one time I tried a dist-upgrade, I corruped my system so massively (like ls and pwd wouldn't find all the files I could see in nautilus) that I was forced to wipe the drive and install Xubuntu 6.06 from scratch.
IIRC Ubuntu actually reccomended that people not do the dist upgrade to get from 6.06 to 6.11, there were so many corrupted installs.
You obviously didn't get it.
1. It was the author's fault, he didn't follow instructions for upgrading and payed the price. If you did something stupid like that on windows you'd end up with broken windows as well. If anything, Thom deserves a beating for FUD spreading.
2. This is a BETA. When Vista BETA had bugs people didn't cry sh*t about it either.
So, next time, please do your research.





Member since:
2005-07-06
Isn't it interesting how when Ubuntu's upgrade option goes "awry" it wasn't such a "bad thing"? If this were a Windows or Mac review it would have got a slating.

Whilst it's nice to have silver linings, a buggy upgrade installation will not help us towards the year of Linux of desktop, so please remember to be objective when required (and if necessary, critical) - just because it's a Linux distribution doesn't mean expectations should be lowered. Of course, in many other aspects of the distro, it looks like things are really coming on