Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 23rd Sep 2007 13:43 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 273823
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Good review with some caveats
by netpython on Mon 24th Sep 2007 13:02
in reply to "RE[4]: Good review with some caveats"
RE[5]: Good review with some caveats
by lemur2 on Mon 24th Sep 2007 13:04
in reply to "RE[4]: Good review with some caveats"
Feature-wise, what beats Amarok on Linux? Not trolling, it's a serious question: if there's a better alternative, I want to know it.
I don't know about "better", but there are some music collection organisers and players of similar functionality:
Listen:
http://www.listen-project.org/
Songbird:
http://www.songbirdnest.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Songbird_(software)
Banshee:
http://banshee-project.org/index.php/Main_Page
Exaile:
http://www.exaile.org/
JuK:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JuK
http://developer.kde.org/~wheeler/juk.html
Rhythmbox:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhythmbox
http://www.gnome.org/projects/rhythmbox/
Edited 2007-09-24 13:07
RE[6]: Good review with some caveats
by superstoned on Mon 24th Sep 2007 16:59
in reply to "RE[5]: Good review with some caveats"
RE[5]: Good review with some caveats
by dylansmrjones on Mon 24th Sep 2007 13:51
in reply to "RE[4]: Good review with some caveats"
RE[6]: Good review with some caveats
by dylansmrjones on Mon 24th Sep 2007 17:02
in reply to "RE[5]: Good review with some caveats"
RE[5]: Good review with some caveats
by Isolationist on Mon 24th Sep 2007 15:09
in reply to "RE[4]: Good review with some caveats"
RE[6]: Good review with some caveats
by Isolationist on Mon 24th Sep 2007 19:05
in reply to "RE[5]: Good review with some caveats"






Member since:
2005-07-06
Feature-wise, what beats Amarok on Linux? Not trolling, it's a serious question: if there's a better alternative, I want to know it.