To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
9/10ths of the time, having a GUI to configure a web service is not a good thing. Apache/(s)FTP/etc... is far too easy a thing to screw up for configuration to be taken lightly. The inclusion of a GUI encourages just any idiot to have a go, rather that someone who sits down and learns what all the implications of what each configuration command are. And in this climate of worldwide botnets and identity theft, everyone has a responsibility to everyone else to properly secure their networks
"And in this climate of worldwide botnets and identity theft, everyone has a responsibility to everyone else to properly secure their networks"
Responsibility... :-) Yes, you have a valid point here. But unfortunately, problems don't hurt its creators / supporters too much in order to be taken seriously. This is due to the shrinking difference between user and administrator which causes means of security to be abandoned step by step in order to increase individual feelings of comfort and safeness.
"9/10ths of the time, having a GUI to configure a web service is not a good thing."
yeah, I think 9/10ths of the time doing it with a text editor is not a good thing.... far to convenient and easy a thing to screw up. Sudddenly everyone thinks they can configure a service. I suggest we get rid of all GUI's and text editors.
Mice really need to go. They enable all kinds of crazyness. Then replace all keyboards with just a zero or one.






Member since:
2005-07-06
When iXsystems acquired PC-BSD, I for one hoped that PC-BSD would concentrate on providing an alternative to Windows Server 2003/2008 i.e. develop, integrate, and provide open source graphical frontends to open source server software such as Apache, Postfix and so forth.
Desktop-wise, judging by the roadmap, PC-BSD 2.0 will be where the action is. Nevertheless, it's good to see movement in the BSD-world.