Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 27th Sep 2007 07:55 UTC, submitted by Augusto
Thread beginning with comment 274777
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: A good interview
by chrono13 on Thu 27th Sep 2007 18:00
in reply to "RE[3]: A good interview"
Thank you very much for that link.
Just counting the "like" specs such as "autoSpaceLikeWord95" and "lineWrapLikeWord6" OOXML is worse than I though.
But it gets really interesting when they actually place provisions in the standard specific to fix or "combat" bugs and help compatibility with older versions of MS Office.
Every single one of those who voted yes either did so corrupted or on the good and reliable word of Microsoft (laugh, it's funny) that this insult to ISO was even an attempt at a standard.




Member since:
2005-07-06
have you actually READ the specification? - it's a clear cut case that no-one else but microsoft can implement it compatibly. Why do you think it lost its ISO fast track?
Try reading the Danish no, with comments - it's pretty good actually:
http://www.ds.dk/_root/scripts/getmedia.asp?media_id=2791