Linked by Smith Johnson on Thu 27th Sep 2007 15:22 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 274828
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-28
Because 5 years is too much for an os release cycle ? But XP happy ending doesn't mean that Vista one will be.
And i agree that fresh installs of XP are good, but the overall problem is that the os setup quality decrease with time, from slowly for a good level user to incredibly fast for a poor level user. And poor user does not know what 'format' and 'reinstall' mean.
To compare with mac os x, or even linux (i agree that a poor skilled user won't be able to do as much things he could in XP or Mac os x), a poor skilled user may not alter the system as fast as he will do under XP.