Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 27th Sep 2007 15:08 UTC, submitted by Martin Husted Hartvig
Thread beginning with comment 274851
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Interesting, althought I don't like Java
by horsnell on Thu 27th Sep 2007 20:34
in reply to "RE: Interesting, althought I don't like Java"
interestingly chip pioneer David Ditzel gave his views on why Java processors weren't a great idea in a recent podcast:
http://go.theregister.com/podcast/2007/09/21/scc_episode7_david_dit...
RE[3]: Interesting, althought I don't like Java
by kaiwai on Fri 28th Sep 2007 01:40
in reply to "RE[2]: Interesting, althought I don't like Java"
The argument is normally because they consume more power or that they add too much to an already bloated chip; but given how things have shrunk - I don't see the harm. I mean, there are things like XML accelerators, cryto off loading boards and tcp/ip off loading. A CPU that can process Java quicker would certainly be a benefit rather than a pointless addition.






Member since:
2005-07-06
Alot of the performance issues could be resolved using a feature within the CPU to speed up execution. IIRC ARM for example created a CPU feature which improved java performance by a huge factor. I'm surprised that Intel/AMD hasn't jumped on the bandwagon - especially for the server space.