Linked by Smith Johnson on Thu 27th Sep 2007 15:22 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 274871
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Thanks a lot. I did not realize a complete backup copy of a movie or album is allowed under Fair Use. Does anyone know why no media company has ever been sued for this.
On your other point, DRM IS DEFINITELY added overhead and is bad (as far as I can see) but my point was that people are agreeing to it when they buy DRM'ed stuff so pointless blaming MS for covering their ass. I am guessing half the idea behind MS's implementation might just be their legal dept saying that we better include it before RIAA sues under DMCA for "facilitating violation" like they did with DVD X Copy, etc. Because when you think about it MS has limited gains from implementing DRM in Windows.
Backup copies are protected under the Fair Use provisions of copyright.
Depends where you live - here in Australia, there is no such thing as "fair use" under our copyright laws.
DRM also adds overhead, which is never a good thing.
True, but the overhead is so negligible that it will have no discernible effect on anything, and certainly not while you are not playing DRM afflicted media.
Depends where you live - here in Australia, there is no such thing as "fair use" under our copyright laws.
Then your copyright laws are defective, and should be amended.
True, but the overhead is so negligible that it will have no discernible effect on anything
I wouldn't be so sure.




Member since:
2005-07-02
Backup copies are protected under the Fair Use provisions of copyright.
DRM also adds overhead, which is never a good thing.