Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 27th Sep 2007 15:06 UTC, submitted by scott
Thread beginning with comment 275086
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
There is an alternative being promoted by Microsoft - XPS; Xerox has already signed up to it. XPS, unlike OOXML, isn't an unmitigated disaster when it comes to documenting the format and better still the licence is open and shut - its free for anyone to implement at not cost.
feel free to call me a burnt child, but even if its xml based, its coming from microsoft. how is the documentation for it? the ooxml one is indeed a disaster.
as in, it does not help that its open for use, if one have to read something thats as readable as the bible in cryllic, written in mirror writing, using rot13...






Member since:
2005-07-06
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PostScript
while the source may be questionable, it seems that postscript has a bit of license cost attached to it.
and its one complex language to by the looks of it.
in comparison, it seems that what most in-house drivers do is take the data, turn it all into a kind of image, and send said image data to the printer.