To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"Who wants to bet that MS will extend XP support even after June 30, 2008?"
So long as XP is profitable, that's a bet no one will wager against. The problem then becomes supportability though...since they are extending the front end (sales) they'll also have to extend the back end (support), which if you're MS is many millions of dollars lost by having engineers who are still trained on supporting XP.
I'm sure they've had an entire fleet of accountants crunch the numbers, and my bet would be that they'll barely break even by pushing both the frontend and backend out 6 more months...however they also have to keep their big customers happy knowing that eventually they'll recoup those costs in Vista licenses.
The point is that I'm sure this wasn't some sudden decision. It probably went all the way up to Ballmer.
"Support" is not the same thing as "availability to OEMs and retail channels". MS's policy has been to support their various OS releases for a number of years--even after newer, shinier ones have hit the street. Didn't Windows 2000 just get its' final "rollup" within the past year or so?
Nevertheless, I agree with what I assume is the actual sentiment behind the statement--XP will very likely be available for well beyond June 30.






Member since:
2006-01-07
Who wants to bet that MS will extend XP support even after June 30, 2008?