Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 29th Sep 2007 21:26 UTC, submitted by Chris Lattner
Thread beginning with comment 275306
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: CLANG GNU's GCC Replacement
by Lobotomik on Sun 30th Sep 2007 16:10
in reply to "RE[3]: CLANG GNU's GCC Replacement"
Pardon me, but it is time to stop propagating this absurd myth.
If there were any GPL code in the NetBSD code, the kernel would still be BSD, but it would be infringing the GPL license until that GPL code was excised. Legal measures could be taken, fines may apply, lawyers would get rich(er), but the BSD license would continue to apply to BSD-licensed code just the same.




Member since:
2006-12-28
I understand where you're coming from but nobody ever said that there's GPL'd code in BSD. In fact, if there was any GPL'd code used in say the NetBSD kernel, it would no longer be BSD.
On the other hand, it is with the help of a fellow opnsource project, namely the GNU C compiler, that other opensource projects, in this case the BSDs, can build they're systems without having to buy expensive compilers. As far as I'm concerned, that's a win-win situation.
I'm happy to hear that there are compilers being release that are more in line with the BSD philosophy, but that hardly means that GCC should not be valued for it's prior usefulness.