Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 5th Sep 2005 13:38 UTC, submitted by Erik Harrison
Thread beginning with comment 27582
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
"What tool do they mean?"
What we mean is that we're taking the shortcut editor out of the WM. In short, we're making the WM _smaller_ while not getting rid of that functionality _at all_
"Now, I have all that, PLUS each panel plugin being a new process, a separate shortcut manager"
Panel plugins don't have to be external processes. It's a one line change to the source and a one line change to a .desktop file to make them internal
Plugins crashed the panel all the time. Only the more complex plugins (like things other than the launcher, or things that do heavy IO) will be external. So, if you have 30 launchers, you won't have 30 pointless processes.
However, if you have the weather plugin, it won't hang the panel if your network is down
Lots of people don't need the shortcut functionality. Moving it out allows them to minimize their desktop overhead (optionally) and makes the WM more stable.
How is this more Gnome like?