Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 3rd Oct 2007 19:39 UTC, submitted by gonzo
Thread beginning with comment 275994
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Microsoft Reference License
by navaraf on Thu 4th Oct 2007 18:36
in reply to "RE[2]: Microsoft Reference License"
Just look at the audit that had to be done on ReactOS because of Microsoft allegations.
At least spread correct information please. The audit wasn't done because of MS allegations, but because of allegations of people from inside the project and from related projects. MS never ever approached ReactOS about it.






Member since:
2005-11-10
Yes, but all Microsoft have to do is make the allegations. They don't have to back them up, or prove them conclusively. Microsoft can claim that such and such app is breaking the licence, and it's up to the app writers to prove otherwise, not Microsoft. MS fires off some cease and desists to the ISP, and before you know it, Microsoft have spun an allegation into an anti-open source, anti non MS-vendor bit of PR.
There's only so many ways you can make a simple function return an answer. Making other programmers have to tip toe around Microsoft's specific implementation will slow down development and increase administration. Just look at the audit that had to be done on ReactOS because of Microsoft allegations.