Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 4th Oct 2007 15:23 UTC, submitted by diegocg
Thread beginning with comment 276200
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"As a rule of thumb: Try to get the best algorithm in c or f90 working before even considering reprogramming the time-critical subroutines in assembler."
Seems, thatt this rule is not very well known, because we have too much ressources these days: too fast CPUs, too much RAM, too big hard disks... who cares about efficient programming anyway? :-)
I really enjoyed the article. Very interesting content, presented in a educational valuable way. Worth having a printed copy on the system shelf.






Member since:
2006-01-19
Definitely a great read!
I would like to mention, that assembler-coding makes you think about memory latencies and throughputs and processor cycles quite a lot.
I did not have much time assemblying lately, but learning it once provided me some insight about the difference between code performance and algorithm performance. As a rule of thumb: Try to get the best algorithm in c or f90 working before even considering reprogramming the time-critical subroutines in assembler.