Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 3rd Oct 2007 19:38 UTC
"Some time ago, I switched to Google's Picasa Web Albums online photo management software. Although it's simple to use, Picasa Web has been missing too many features for too long, and after Google locked me out of their software for a few days due to a bug of some sort, and their iPhoto plug-in stopped working, I decided it was time to start checking out the alternatives. I have played with a few services, and judged them based on a number of criteria. I've tested the following services: Picasa Web Albums, Flickr, Zoto, Zooomr, SmugMug, Photobucket, Facebook, and MySpace. Read on for my initial results."
Thread beginning with comment 276290
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:2005-07-06
> family pack with 5 accounts and 20GB in all
And that costs over $100 (per year, I suppose)? That's insanely expensive!!! In a few years I've already taken 10 GiB of photos, and with the rest of my family included we have over 30 GiB. Photography enthusiasts might easily have ten times that.
(And here I thought SmugMug was expensive with its $40/year with unlimited storage.)
Member since:
2007-08-08
Anyone serious about uploading pictures will have to pay something. For mac users .mac ($100) may have more sense now with 10GB, Leopard new features and the nice webgallery integrated with iPhoto. Another interesting option I may choose is the family pack with 5 accounts and 20GB in all. Also you can get a reduction of 30$ when buying a new mac.