Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 5th Sep 2005 13:38 UTC, submitted by Erik Harrison
Thread beginning with comment 27633
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
It's not anachronistic, it's just one way of doing things. Either you have systems that attempt to do everything as an all-in-one solution, or you have small modular linkable programs that do one thing and do it well.
KDE more or less follows the small modular linkable programs idea- the supposed bloat seems to come from the fact that they include small modular programs for every purpose under the sun, that they distribute in large bunches. Well, that and the way that all the interconnected libraries, once loaded, take up a lot of room.





Member since:
2005-07-21
The UNIX tradition is to have specialized, modular components that make up the desktop as a whole.
I think KDE is more unified than Windows especially with KParts etc. And I disagree about being unified being unUnix-like. Having all your applications linked together is like having pipes between bash commands inseatd of writiing everything to a file and processing every seperately. I think the concept of Unix is to unify and work together seemlessly (e.g. NFS mounts behave like a local harddrive).