Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 6th Oct 2007 22:59 UTC, submitted by Christoph Plamper
Thread beginning with comment 276619
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
which is exactly what i am doing, by saying that everyone can choose to configure it to the way they want, or simply use defaults..
people arent FORCED to configure stuff, so they can simply choose not to, and thats fine by me, but they better damn well respect my choice of making use of configuration abilities, and why the hell shouldnt they? how does more options which they can simply choose not to use, hurt them?






Member since:
2006-03-23
Well i for sure hope that no features really gets removed, because if someone cant use them, or dont wanna bother finding out what they do, then just stay away from them, its not like they DEMAND that you press them and tweak them to doomsday.
so the solution is simple, Have a good allaround defalt, which i believe KDE has, and then users which wants to customize can choose to do so, and users who want to do nothing, can simply stay away from the configuration dialogs. And if they cannot stay away from it, well, thats really their problem, i dont see why i should give up my abilities because they dont wanna use them, and as such, dont wanna have them even exist.
And this is why i currently use KDE, its abilities reflects these philosophies, which, (and yes, i dare say this) is the RIGHT one.