Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 7th Oct 2007 15:19 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 276642
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Not to be rude...
by SlackerJack on Sun 7th Oct 2007 16:10
in reply to "RE: Not to be rude..."
RE[3]: Not to be rude...
by GeneralZod on Sun 7th Oct 2007 16:30
in reply to "RE[2]: Not to be rude..."
If anyone posts any kind of screenshot or image that is related to the KDE project then, no matter how structurally/ conceptually different it is to anything in Microsoft's oeuvre, *someone* will say "lol it looks just like Windoze!1". It's practically a law of nature - a really boring and tiresome one.
Edited 2007-10-07 16:30






Member since:
2006-10-08
"Not to be rude, but this appears to be *very* similar to what Vista has."
Hmmm... judging jsut from screenshots I'll have to agree. In my opinion, it seems to be a trend today for Linux look and feel to imitate some MICROS~1 look and feel... it looks like a combination of CDE (XFCE 3), the Mac OS X dock, the "Vista" start menu, and the "Vista" color scheme. This is not the only example. Strange...
"It looks like this is just a more convenient interface to a menu that uses a non-standard way of categorising applications."
As I read from the PDF (p. 3), the menu structure is guided by actions (what you actually want to do) instead by application categories (what tool you want to use). I think this may be a good approach to novice users who are not familiar with the tools (way), but know what they finally want (result).
Favourites and application description (more than just one line) are a very interesting idea. If it's really used to extend user friendlyness, it might gain the communitiy more users.