Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 7th Oct 2007 14:53 UTC, submitted by Margret Hennesy
Windows The first officially-released build of Windows XP SP3 has surfaced, with 1073 patches/hotfixes and several new features. This build has been made available to testers as a part of the Windows Vista SP1 and Windows Server 2008 beta program and is available in English, German, and Japanese.
Thread beginning with comment 276658
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Hmm...
by HangLoose on Sun 7th Oct 2007 16:41 UTC in reply to "RE: Hmm..."
HangLoose
Member since:
2007-09-03

Next time maybe they wont take so much time to release an OS... Otherwise it's going to be another "die hard" version.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[3]: Hmm...
by kaiwai on Sun 7th Oct 2007 16:52 in reply to "RE[2]: Hmm..."
kaiwai Member since:
2005-07-06

The problem is that they're making 'gradual breakages' to the point that customers know that each release is going to break something major.

The solution; completely overhaul the operating system rather than incremental breakages; then at least people *know* that the following release will less like to introduce mini-breakages.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[4]: Hmm...
by gonzo on Sun 7th Oct 2007 19:00 in reply to "RE[3]: Hmm..."
gonzo Member since:
2005-11-10

The solution; completely overhaul the operating system rather than incremental breakages;

We already know that does not work: for example,that is why people are not switching to Linux even though it is free.

Compatibility is *very* important hence gradual changes.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 8

No...
by Belial6 on Sun 7th Oct 2007 22:10 in reply to "RE[3]: Hmm..."
Belial6 Member since:
2007-06-07

The 'backwards compatibility' argument became a red herring, the day that MS bought VirtualPC.

MS needs to properly integrate VirtualPC into their next version of Windows, and when someone clicks the 'Windows XP' compatibility checkbox on a software app, run that app in a sandbox. They own the old versions of Windows. They own VirtualPC. The hit that software takes running as a guest OS in a virtual machine is just not that big. This would bring virtually 100% backward compatibility while allowing the the new version of Windows to completely break compatibility with old APIs.

I don't expect this to happen though. Can you imagine the flack that MS would take if they wrote a new OS from scratch, and it sucked as bad as Windows? 'Backward Compatibility' is a very convenient excuse that they are not going to want to throw away by using a simple available solution.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 4