Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 8th Oct 2007 20:18 UTC, submitted by Corinne Iozzio
Thread beginning with comment 277060
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Network performance?
by PlatformAgnostic on Tue 9th Oct 2007 05:01
in reply to "RE: Network performance?"
RE[3]: Network performance?
by raver31 on Tue 9th Oct 2007 06:45
in reply to "RE[2]: Network performance?"
RE[2]: Network performance?
by cg0def on Tue 9th Oct 2007 12:16
in reply to "RE: Network performance?"
well you shouldn't complain too much since those same *improvements* are coming to XP as well and quite possibly to server 2k3. One thing I know is that SP3 ( while still in beta ) causes huge problems with the wireless connections on my XP machine. Wired generally does not have connection problems but they do occur sometimes and overall networking in SP2 works better than with SP3 beta installed. So if SP1 for vista is anything like this shame on them for claiming that it's in a beta stage. Beta software is supposed to be generally stable while it still might have some bugs as sufficient testing has not been done yet. Only MS seems to change the meanings of alpha and beta every time their marketing team deems it profitable ...




Member since:
2006-10-16
That could be the result of the "new and improved" network stack in vista. At the last TS2 seminar they claimed better network performance between vista to vista /server 2008 than any windows version yet.