Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 9th Oct 2007 16:14 UTC, submitted by Rahul
Thread beginning with comment 277184
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Red Hat does
http://www.redhat.com/rhel/details/assurance/
Novell's deals has only helped validate this kind of FUD.
"Ballmer praised Novell at the UK event for valuing intellectual property, and suggested that open source vendors will be forced to strike similar deals with other patent holders."
"Does RedHat provide indemnification to its users?"
In most countries this is not necessary since end-users/consumers can not be expected to understand the internal complex workings of the products they purchase and what patents they could possibly violate. Patent violations are the responsibility of the manufacturer and/or distributor.





Member since:
2006-03-06
What is it with this guy? They have been going back and forth on this for years and they haven't produced any evidence that there *is* infringement. Even if there were, the company distributing it should be liable, not the users. I am not a violent man, but I really feel like slapping Ballmer in the face on occasion.