Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 14th Oct 2007 15:10 UTC, submitted by michuk
Thread beginning with comment 278298
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Very few of the major Linux distros have 6-month release schedules. The majority of them have 9-18 month schedules. And the non-Linux OSes supported by KDE also have longer than 6-month release schedules.
Release things when they're ready, not when some arbitrary date passes on the calendar.




Member since:
2005-07-06
KDE's release history is somewhat inconsistant:
1.0 - 1.1 - 9 mo.
1.1 - 2.0 - 19 mo.
2.0 - 2.1 - 4 mo.
2.1 - 2.2 - 6 mo.
2.2 - 3.0 - 7 mo.
3.0 - 3.1 - 9 mo.
3.1 - 3.2 - 11 mo.
3.2 - 3.3 - 7 mo.
3.3 - 3.4 - 7 mo.
3.4 - 3.5 - 9 mo.
3.5 - 4.0 - ~25 mo. (Assuming a Dec. 07 release)
Only twice was a release completed inside 6 mo, with 7-9 mo. releases more common. Basically, over the past history, if a major distro (pretty much everyone outside of Debian?) wants to stick to a steady April/Octrober release schedule, it's been a tough proposition to get the latest KDE release ready to ship in time for the whole distro's release.
Now I'm a big fan of KDE, but I really have a hard time understanding the reasoning behind not wanting to go with a release schedule that meets the needs of most of the major distro's. The distros are the primary means of getting the software to users, and thus are a major marketing vehicle that shouldn't be easily blown off.