Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 11th Jul 2005 17:32 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 2787
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Microsoft and Sun.
by corrosive23 on Tue 12th Jul 2005 00:09
in reply to "RE[2]: Microsoft and Sun."
RE[3]: Microsoft and Sun.
by abraxas on Tue 12th Jul 2005 10:34
in reply to "RE[2]: Microsoft and Sun."
The ACL concepts & extensive usage of them is more advanced than anything in the Unix world.
That's not true. Take a look these:
http://www.nsa.gov/selinux
http://www.grsecurity.net
http://www.rsbac.de
That's just linux. You'll find ACL's in Solaris and BSD too.
There really isn't that much that's wrong with the Windows NT on the system itself
Except for the fact that a program crash can take the entire system down.




Member since:
Rosetta isn't a compatibility layer that does any type of API emulation or translation; it simply allows PPC OS X code to run on x86 OS X. Same libraries/APIs, different CPU.
Many people ignorantly assume that the Unix way is the only good way to do things. The ACL concepts & extensive usage of them is more advanced than anything in the Unix world.
There really isn't that much that's wrong with the Windows NT on the system itself; besides stability issues with some drivers, I don't have many complaints. (It's some of the user-level software and design, such as Administrator by default, etc. that really hurt Windows.)