Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 16th Oct 2007 20:41 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Thread beginning with comment 278796
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
They're going to adapt the Ubuntu model of official and unofficial repositories. If Sun would make their repository for-pay (which they don't intend to, alone because it would be counterproductive to adoption rates), someone could just mirror their repository and host it out of their jurisdiction.
To be honest, I believe Sun, Canonical, Redhat, Mandriva, Suse, et al. SHOULD charge for their update service. If ever there was a way to recoup the cost of creating this excellent software, the service of providing high-speed, reliable, up-to-date, verified packages for updating your system is a service the should be charged for. I am so SICK of the get everything free (cost) mentality that pervades much of the Free (freedom) software world.




Member since:
2007-05-19
A package manager is great, but is Sun going to charge you for access to the repositories behind it? (as they do for non-security updates in Solaris 10)