Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 6th Sep 2005 12:20 UTC, submitted by Rahul
Linux Andrew Morton has provided a short list of features and fixes that will be included in the 2.6.14 kernel which include OCFS2, Relayfs, v9fs, FUSE, pcmcia and scheduler updates among other changes including hundreds of bug fixes.
Thread beginning with comment 27950
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Better support for webcams?
by HagerR15 on Tue 6th Sep 2005 19:27 UTC in reply to "Better support for webcams?"
HagerR15
Member since:
2005-07-25

The disagreement cannot be resolved as it would require implementing binary-only code into the kernel. This will never happen as the linux kernel needs to remain 100% open source. I too have a Logitech Quickcam (not Orbit, but Notebook) but I believe the driver is the same, qc-usb. I find compiling the module works better if performed manually (./configure, make all, make install) instead of using the install script.

Of course, I find compiling anything using Slackware (my preferred distro) works better than in SuSE.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

Member since:

"The disagreement cannot be resolved as it would require implementing binary-only code into the kernel. This will never happen as the linux kernel needs to remain 100% open source."

I do not believe this to be true. Please keep in mind I am not a developer so will not have the terminology licked...

I was of the understanding that there was a "hook" that was not binary only but was soley there for the purpose of allowing a binary only module to be inserted, it served NO other function.

I'm not going to get in to the merits of whether or not it should have been kept in, I just wanted to point out I do not beleive the kernel needed any binary only code (for the record, the camera DID and DOES work with out the plugin, just no where near as adequately).

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 0

HagerR15 Member since:
2005-07-25

Yep, you're right. It was the hook to binary code that is the problem. I forgot about the "hook-to" part of it.

But no, the kernel developers aren't going to budge on this one. It is as it is and that's how it's going to stay.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1