Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 21st Oct 2007 11:02 UTC, submitted by irbis
Thread beginning with comment 279724
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.




Member since:
2005-07-24
"""
So a rogue binary would just bypass SELinux? Beautiful. What's the point of SELinux again?
"""
Traditional file permissions, however, would not be bypassed. Assuming, of course, that one did not neglect to double check them out of a false sense of security conferred by SELinux, or due to allotting too much time to resolving some subtle bug in a vendor-supplied SELinux policy. ;-)
Edited 2007-10-22 05:42