Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 22nd Oct 2007 09:15 UTC, submitted by Flatland_Spider
Windows While newly minted Windows head Steven Sinofsky continues to play his cards close to his chest, we're seeing signs that Microsoft is rethinking its monolithic approach to not only the mass-market Windows operating system but the entire family of Windows products from servers down to CE-based embedded devices. First up is a streamlined microkernel codenamed MinWin, around which a re-engineered Windows line will be built. Described as 'the Windows 7 source-code base', in reference to the successor to Windows Vista which is slated for a 2010 release, MinWin strips back the current NT-based kernel to the barest of bare metal. Ars Technica has more, including a one hour video presentation [.wmv] about MinWin. Sassy quote of the day by Microsoft kernel engineer Eric Traut: "A lot of people think of Windows as this really large bloated operating system, and that may be a fair characterisation, I have to admit." My take: Maybe this will be closer to reality after all?
Thread beginning with comment 279759
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
compatibility?
by Darkelve on Mon 22nd Oct 2007 09:47 UTC
Darkelve
Member since:
2006-02-06

Does this new kernel mean MS will finally give up on backward compatibility?

RE: compatibility?
by n4cer on Mon 22nd Oct 2007 09:52 in reply to "compatibility?"
n4cer Member since:
2005-07-06

This isn't just a kernel, nor is it new. It's currently shipping with Vista.

http://community.winsupersite.com/blogs/paul/archive/2007/10/19/mic...

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE[2]: compatibility?
by BluenoseJake on Mon 22nd Oct 2007 12:48 in reply to "RE: compatibility?"
BluenoseJake Member since:
2005-08-11

Read your own link, that's about Windows 7

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

v RE: compatibility?
by Almafeta on Mon 22nd Oct 2007 11:46 in reply to "compatibility?"
RE[2]: compatibility?
by Darkelve on Mon 22nd Oct 2007 13:04 in reply to "RE: compatibility?"
Darkelve Member since:
2006-02-06

Why would I want to use a "freeware" operating system?

Did you mean: "open source" ?

My point is simply, that with large changes to the architecture, providing backwards compatibility might prove to be problematic. XP was not 100% backwards compatible (meaning, a number of applications refusing to run properly/at all), and from what I have read for Vista it was even a bit worse.

So now I wonder how that will fare in the next version. The kernel seems to be an important part of the equation, although I could be wrong.

Edited 2007-10-22 13:07

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2