Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 22nd Oct 2007 09:15 UTC, submitted by Flatland_Spider
Thread beginning with comment 279759
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
This isn't just a kernel, nor is it new. It's currently shipping with Vista.
http://community.winsupersite.com/blogs/paul/archive/2007/10/19/mic...
Why would I want to use a "freeware" operating system?
Did you mean: "open source" ?
My point is simply, that with large changes to the architecture, providing backwards compatibility might prove to be problematic. XP was not 100% backwards compatible (meaning, a number of applications refusing to run properly/at all), and from what I have read for Vista it was even a bit worse.
So now I wonder how that will fare in the next version. The kernel seems to be an important part of the equation, although I could be wrong.
Edited 2007-10-22 13:07






Member since:
2006-02-06
Does this new kernel mean MS will finally give up on backward compatibility?