Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 24th Oct 2007 20:08 UTC, submitted by twickline
Thread beginning with comment 280522
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Likewise, MS supporting Red Hat is like admitting that Red Hat is not doing anything wrong -- which is contrary to all of the comments by Ballmer.
No it isn't. MS isn't supporting Red Hat, they're making sure Linux can run well with Virtual Server.
I don't see why this is so hard to understand?
I don't see why business realities are so hard to understand. Obviously some shops run Linux and will not change to Windows (no matter how many sales drones MS sends their way) so MS is left with the options of either not making any sale at all or making a sale of Virtual Server.






Member since:
2006-01-14
Look... we all know that competitors frequently make deals with each other when they feel it is economically in their best interest. Case in point, MS/Novell.
This, on the other hand, is more akin to accusing someone of being an idiot, yet you go on to hire them to do your taxes for you. You can't have your cake and eat it, too. One action is invalidating the other.
Likewise, MS supporting Red Hat is like admitting that Red Hat is not doing anything wrong -- which is contrary to all of the comments by Ballmer.
I don't see why this is so hard to understand?
Edited 2007-10-25 03:06