Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 25th Oct 2007 16:19 UTC, submitted by abdavidson
Thread beginning with comment 280846
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Some prefer to lead. You prefer to follow...
That's a pretty long bow you're drawing there, considering you don't even know me.
I use Firefox because it does what I want. I'm not 'following' anyone. I 'choose' to accept Firefox because it does at the end of the day work the way I want it very well, even though its memory utilisation is horrid.
If you don't use any of the rich features of Opera, at least there's one big difference is speed. Speed to load the browser, speed to load pages, speed to go forward, backward. Another one is memory usage. If you want to use a lot less RAM, Opera is the way to go...Unless you have tons of expensive RAM under the hood.




Member since:
2005-07-13
You say this like it's no small thing. Firefox's resource usage is getting out of hand. I have an old PII750 tower system with Kubuntu that I mostly use as a home server, and occassionally as a desktop. I can load Opera, bring up Google, execute a search, and click on any one of the returned links in less time than it takes Firefox to even load. Let alone the way the system will start to crawl after a couple of hours of Firefox being open with multiple tabs.
Some prefer to lead. You prefer to follow...