Linked by Eugenia Loli on Fri 26th Oct 2007 05:34 UTC, submitted by WillM
Talk, Rumors, X Versus Y "Experts say that migrations from Unix to Linux have slowed down because all the low-hanging fruit has now been picked. Linux growth in the U.S. x86 server market has, over the past six quarters, started to falter and reverse its positive course relative to Windows Server and the market as a whole." More here.
Thread beginning with comment 280881
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Anyone actually read the article?
by ssa2204 on Fri 26th Oct 2007 07:14 UTC
Member since:

"Margaret Lewis, the director of commercial solutions for AMD in Austin, Texas, has also noticed the slowdown in Linux growth over the past few quarters.

In 2000, Windows comprised about half of the server operating system market, followed by Unix and Netware at about 17 percent each and Linux reaching towards 10 percent, she said, noting that today Windows owns about 70 percent, Linux about 20 percent, with Unix below 10 percent and Netware barely registering.

"Looking at these large operating system market swings, you could draw the conclusion that Linux has gotten the 'low-hanging fruit' in terms of migration," Lewis said.

"Without the larger pool of Unix and NetWare users who are ripe for migration, there is not quite the level of fuel. You could assume that Linux is now ready to settle down to a more regular growth curve representative of a more mature technology." "

I think the above quote pretty much says it all. No reason to get emotional and hyperbolic

Reply Score: 6

siride Member since:

And perhaps this will be another kick in the pants to get the arrogant devs to just sit down and realize that when the users complain, or things are overly complex, that it's a good time to fix things up instead of flaming the users and ignoring their requests and bug reports. I don't know why users are treated like some sort of evil fungus that needs to be eradicated.

In my own work, when I write internal apps for others to use, I get feedback, not as much as I'd like, and I take it seriously. If somebody says "I don't like how xyz happens when I do abc" or even "it'd be nice if it could do X", then I take it seriously. Maybe the exact fix that they suggest is incorrect, but it means that there's something non-obvious or inefficient in my interface design, and it needs to be fixed. The best programs are ones where you don't feel like you are having to do more work than necessary, or that it feels overly complex and hard to learn...or on the flip side, overly limiting. Firefox is a good example of a good program, and there was an article a little while ago about how much time the lead developers spent considering features and UI design, and it shows. I rarely feel frustrated when using Firefox, or configuring it.

Anyways, the point of all this is, it's really time for Linux developers to start being more serious. I don't care about Joe Itchscratcher who is writing text editor #42. I'm talking about the devs working on the big flagship projects. Too many times developers say the users are stupid, and close bugs with WONTFIX, or they just ignore the complaints as if they are not valid. EVERY complaint is valid in some way. Even if you are working as a volunteer, it's good to have the attitude of "yes, I'm spending more time working on some uninteresting but, BUT I'm helping this piece of software be a really good piece of software, and I'm making some people happy, and I'm furthering the community that has given me these projects to work on".

BTW, I'm not saying all Linux devs are like this. But there are enough, and there's not enough focus on quality and tightness in free software. And that's where Linux is going to really start hurting as people really begin to demand higher quality.

Reply Parent Score: 4

agrouf Member since:

Ever tryed submitting a Windows bug?

Reply Parent Score: 4

christianhgross Member since:

The person who replied sort of illustrates the point you are making, "Ever tried submitting a Windows bug?"

That sort of reasoning says, "if Windows is difficult then it is ok that we are difficult as well." Exactly your point.

I recently made this comment in a LUG and I was shot down and flammed... I even to this day have people sending me emails on how wrong I am!

What I see is a generation divide. There are those who grew up in the late 90's and were part of the Open Source scene. They were the Microsoft haters, and made Open Source great. But in the last two years things have changed. Look at the netcraft studies. I think the next generation of Open Source developers don't exist!

The next generation of Open Source developers are in fact Open Source users and rabid Open Source defenders, but they don't actually cut code that helps the overall system. It is hurting Open Source. And while I doubt Open Source is dead the high water mark has been reached.

Microsoft had stellar earnings, and I predict this marks the turning point in Microsoft...

Reply Parent Score: 3