Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 29th Oct 2007 20:27 UTC
Mac OS X "While the Apple hype machine and its fanatical followers would have you believe that Mac OS X 10.5 'Leopard' is a major upgrade to the company's venerable operating system, nothing could be further from the truth. Instead, Leopard is yet another evolutionary upgrade in a long line of evolutionary OS X upgrades, all of which date back to the original OS X release in 2001. But let me get one huge misunderstanding out of the way immediately: That's not a dig at Leopard at all. Indeed, if anything, Apple is in an enviable position: OS X is so solid, so secure, and so functionally excellent that it must be getting difficult figuring out how to massage another USD 129 out even the most ardent fans. Folks, Leopard is good stuff. But then that's been true of Mac OS X for quite a while now." Additionally, Apple acknowledges installation problems caused by Unsanity's APE, while others are complaining about problems with Java, or visual oddities. Additionally, there are hacks that restore the black dock triangles, opacify the menubar, and to enable Time Machine on Airport disks. Update: It appears the Leopard firewall has a dent in its armour.
Thread beginning with comment 281834
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: This is quite amusing
by evangs on Tue 30th Oct 2007 15:53 UTC in reply to "This is quite amusing"
Member since:

- 'Unlike Leopard, Windows Vista has been rearchitected from the ground up'
- 'Meanwhile, Leopard is an incremental, evolutionary update over the previous release with no major architectural changes, which makes me wonder why Apple is even charging for it: In the Windows world, such releases are called service packs.'

Given John Siracusa's excellent article on Mac OS X just a few days ago, that statement is laughable. For example, the kernel and the addition of DTrace, FSEvents, Resolution independence and better task scheduling. These aren't necessarily visible to the user, but they require a lot of work to implement.

Reply Parent Score: 4