To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
As far as I can recall, this is the first trojan in the wild for OS X - instead of previous alarm bells that were just proof-of-concepts or whatever.
That is what made me publish it on OSNews today. There is no conspiracy.
Ah yes, the "I don't like this news, so it not news" approach.
MacOS makes a big deal about how their OS does not get viruses:
http://movies.apple.com/movies/us/apple/getamac_ads1/viruses_480x37...
It is therefore newsworthy if they are then affected by them. Simple.
And yes, I am aware of the difference between a virus and a trojan, and it makes no difference.
yes it does... because you still have to agree to install/run the program
So yes, os X gets malware.. but in windows with IE all you have to do is surf a malicious website and suddenly you have malware without agreeing to it. Admittedly SP2 now USUALLY gives the option to install or not but this certainly does not mean OSX is vulnerable to un assisted crapware.
This is just like a malicious wmv codec license, nothing more nothing less.
Just wait till there is one for Ubuntu, then Bill Gates will know his monopoly is over.
[Edit:] TYPO
Edited 2007-11-01 05:43






Member since:
2005-11-12
I understand this and so do others but making it news like it's some kind of dooms day device on the OS is not right. Just the right timing for not long after the Leopard release, got to love OSnews.